Sean: ãããããªãã£ã
Email subscription to blog articles
whiteperil at lists.powerblogs.com
Sun Jul 1 00:36:48 EDT 2007
Posted by Sean:
しょうがなかった
http://whiteperil.com/posts/1183264594.shtml
You don't see this very frequently: Minister of Defense Fumio Kyuma
[1]gave a talk yesterday:
Opposition parties unanimously criticized Defense Minister Fumio
Kyuma for remarks he made in a lecture on 30 June. Kyuma had stated
that the dropping of the atom bomb by the United States during
World War II was "unavoidable."
Kyuma is the only sitting cabinet member from Nagasaki Prefecture.
[2]Reaction to his dissent from orthodoxy has been swift and furious:
Kyuma said later that his comments had been misinterpreted, telling
reporters he meant to say the bombing "could not be helped from the
American point of view."
"It's too bad that my comments were interpreted as approving the
U.S. bombing," he said.
...
Bombing survivors have developed various illnesses from radiation
exposure, including cancer and liver diseases.
"The U.S. justifies the bombings saying they saved American lives,"
said Nobuo Miyake, 78, director-general of a group of victims
living in Tokyo. "It's outrageous for a Japanese politician to
voice such thinking. Japan is a victim."
Nagasaki Mayor Tomihisa Taue was quoted as saying by Kyodo, "The
use of nuclear weapons constitutes the indiscriminate massacre of
ordinary citizens, and it cannot be justified for any reason."
...
In America, the bombings are widely seen as a weapon of last resort
against an enemy that was determined to fight to the death but
instead surrendered unconditionally, six days after Nagasaki was
attacked.
There are many things to admire, even love, about Japan; but surely
one of its more unpalatable cultural traits is its tendency to look
for reasons to feel put-upon and victimized. The way people talk about
the A-bomb, one would never know that Japan had tried to take over all
of East Asia. (Its invading forces were not known for their
scrupulously upright treatment of ordinary citizens.) One would never
know that the Allies had spent the last year enduring through Saipan,
Iwo Jima, Okinawa.
I don't mean to make a coarse tu quoque argument here. I'm perfectly
willing to acknowledge that America had geopolitical reasons for using
the atom bomb that went beyond the saintly desire to prevent more
blood from being spilled in the immediate future. Japan had inserted
itself into World War II as our enemy, and we needed to defeat it, and
we needed to win. It would be nice if war didn't work that way, but it
does. It's easy for me to say this as an American, I guess, but I
don't think Kyuma's acknowledgment that it wasn't our job to play nice
with Japan in 1945 can be construed as "approval." It's certainly
going to be interesting to see where this goes politically, though.
References
1. http://www.nikkei.co.jp/news/past/honbun.cfm?i=AT3S3001O%2030062007&g=MH&d=20070630
2. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/J/JAPAN_ATOMIC_BOMB_COMMENT_ASOL-?SITE=YOMIURI&SECTION=HOSTED_ASIA&TEMPLATE=ap_national.html
More information about the whiteperil
mailing list