[whiteperil] Sean: By any other name
Email subscription to blog articles
whiteperil at lists.powerblogs.com
Thu Aug 16 00:17:54 EDT 2007
Posted by Sean:
By any other name
http://whiteperil.com/posts/1187237853.shtml
The anniversary of Japan's World War II surrender always brings
controversy over visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, where fourteen men
convicted as Class-A war criminals by the international tribunal are
enshrined along with fallen military personnel. Yesterday, former
Prime Minister Koizumi [1]went, but of the sitting cabinet, the only
member to [2]make a pilgrimage was Sanae Takaichi, State Minister for
(of all things!) Okinawan Affairs. The Mainichi also ran an article
citing high-ranking sources stating that Emperor Hirohito believed
that including the fourteen Class-A war criminals in the enshrinees at
Yasukuni was a diplomatic error: "While the Shrine gives repose to the
souls only of those who died in the war [itself], this would change
its nature," and "[This move] will plant the seeds for deep-rooted
trouble in the future with nations that were affected by the war."
I've always been of two minds about the Yasukuni issue. I have no
trouble explaining why I disagree with the shrine's [3]official
position. (This is from the English site.):
According to the faith conveyed to us by the mythical accounts of
the Nihon Shoki and the Kojiki, the Kami, Izanagi and Izanami, in
giving birth to the country of Japan, also gave birth to the
people. This is to say that the Japanese islands and people are
both born from the Kami. Therefore, the soul of man is identical
with the Kami. And so long as this universe continues to exist, the
soul of man can be nothing else than eternal.
â¦
Isn't it a fact that the West with its military power invaded and
ruled over much of Asia and Africa and that this was the start of
East-West relations? There is no uncertainty in history. [!]
Japan's dream of building a Great East Asia was necessitated by
history and it was sought after by the countries of Asia. We cannot
overlook the intent of those who wish to tarnish the good name of
the noble souls of Yasukuni.
â¦
To bring an end to war is the earnest wish of mankind. Regardless
of whether we can realize this or not, the act of despising the
souls of those who offered their lives for the national community
by those who were left behind is no more than extreme ingratitude
of a people without a country.
Note the way this allows the administrators of the shrine to have it
both waysâpositioning Japan as in line with the rest of mankind in
desiring world peace while justifying the practice of honoring those
who presided over Unit 731 and the Rape of Nanking. Japanese theology
regards the souls of good and evil alike as passing into the next
world-âfine. But that doesn't mean it provides a good defense for
failing to draw moral distinctions among their actions while they were
alive in this one.
On the other hand, one can visit a house of worship without
necessarily buying into the full line pushed by those people in charge
of it. Koizumi's stubbornness about making pilgrimages to Yasukuni
always struck me as politically unwise, but his positions on the WOT,
economic liberalization, and individualism were enough to convince me
that he wasn't a closet Tojo fan. Koizumi probably does believe that
you can perform rituals at Yasukuni without letting all the kami off
the hook for their war conduct. Not so sure about others, including
those on the cabinet.
Speaking of conflicting religious conceptions, [4]this (via
[5]Instapundit) strikes me as very worrying, though hardly without
precedent:
A Roman Catholic Bishop in the Netherlands has proposed people of
all faiths refer to God as Allah to foster understanding, stoking
an already heated debate on religious tolerance in a country with
one million Muslims.
Bishop Tiny Muskens, from the southern diocese of Breda, told Dutch
television on Monday that God did not mind what he was named and
that in Indonesia, where Muskens spent eight years, priests used
the word "Allah" while celebrating Mass.
â¦
A survey in the Netherlands' biggest-selling newspaper De Telegraaf
on Wednesday found 92 percent of the more than 4,000 people polled
disagreed with the bishop's view, which also drew ridicule.
Huh? Words refer to ideas, and ideas have consequences, to coin a
phrase.
It's one thing for Christians in a mostly non-Christian country to
call God by the best local equivalent. Professor Bainbridge [6]says,
"Words matter. To a person of faith, no word matters more than the
name of God," but in my experience, there is some give there. For
example, Japanese Christians also call God ç¥æ§ (kamisama: kind of
like "God, Sir"). However, those I've meet are keenly aware of the
difference between their god and the Japanese kami themselves. And
Dutch, presumably, already has a perfectly good word for "God." The
substitution of "Allah" would presumably imply to the average listener
that the speaker was mindedly shading it with the conception of God in
Islam. I'm not sure what can be accomplished through that at this
historical moment except the beclouding of distinctions between
religions that it would be wise to keep in mind.
References
1. http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/national/news/20070815p2a00m0na006000c.html
2. http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/national/news/20070815p2a00m0na034000c.html
3. http://www.yasukuni.or.jp/english/
4. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20279326/?GT1=10252
5. http://instapundit.com/archives2/008236.php
6. http://www.professorbainbridge.com/2007/08/the-name-of-god.html
More information about the whiteperil
mailing list