[whiteperil] Sean: A broken frame
Email subscription to blog articles
whiteperil at lists.powerblogs.com
Sun Sep 3 01:37:38 EDT 2006
Posted by Sean:
A broken frame
http://whiteperil.com/posts/1157261854.shtml
Since the Aneha scandal broke last year, federal officials have
manifested a charming capacity for surprise. The [1]latest shock:
The infrastructure ministry, stunned to learn that builders rarely
bother to scrutinize architectural blueprints, will require that
they do so for all new wooden homes to make sure the structures are
quake-proof, officials said.
They said builders must study the design plans before construction
starts after learning that such procedures are rarely observed
these days.
The ministry was so shocked at the finding that it decided to
rescind an exemption put in place 22 years ago to allow builders to
skip such checks.
The move comes on the heels of recent disclosures about a Tokyo
company that built and sold nearly 700 wooden homes with
substandard earthquake resistance, officials said.
...
Even more surprising was a finding by a cooperative association for
quake-proof strength on wooden buildings, whose members are mostly
medium- and small-sized builders.
It said that 62 percent of about 24,000 wooden homes it surveyed
were not strong enough to withstand an earthquake even though they
were put up in or after 1981, when quake-proof standards were
tightened.
Is it really that surprising that construction companies would skip a
step they'd been expressly exempted from having to execute? The Aneha
scandal [2]demonstrated that not even civil servants whose explicit
responsibility was to verify structural calculations roused themselves
to do so.
The wooden building problem is a big deal, of course. Despite the
folksy belief that wood-framed buildings are less likely to collapse
in earthquakes because their flexible joints and organic materials
allow them to flop around in harmony with Gaia until she settles
down--seriously, you hear that from people here all the time--the fact
is that wooden buildings have to be very well engineered to be safe.
And when they do collapse, they're more likely to tip over than are
buildings of rebarred concrete, which makes them more dangerous for
the neighbors.
References
1. http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200609020154.html
2. http://www.whiteperil.com/posts/1133068778.shtml
More information about the whiteperil
mailing list