[whataretheysaying] Mary Madigan: On the Serb protests
Email subscription to blog articles
whataretheysaying at lists.powerblogs.com
Fri Feb 22 22:17:33 EST 2008
Posted by Mary Madigan:
On the Serb protests
http://whataretheysaying.powerblogs.com/posts/1203736248.shtml
Christopher Hitchens in [1]Slate:
It is very important to remember that Slobodan Milosevic launched
his own petty and violent career, as the head of a Serb-Montenegrin
crime family, precisely by canceling Kosovo's pre-existing autonomy
in 1990, remaking himself as a nationalist demagogue instead of a
Communist one, and bringing in the roof of the Yugoslav federation.
You will by now have read dark remarks made by partisans of the
Russian and Serb Orthodox viewpoint, to the effect that if one
"secession" is allowed, then what is to prevent every Gypsy or
Chechen or Ossetian from proclaiming their own statelet? You
should, first, ask if the Bosnian Serbs ought not to have thought
of this first and been better advised by the "realist" or Kissinger
school that now weeps such hypocritical tears. You should, second,
ask if you know of any case comparable to the Kosovo one, where a
national minority was so long imprisoned within an artificial
state.
Of course, one ought to acknowledge that this is a calamity for the
Serbs and indeed an injustice in the sense of an insult to their
pride and history. But the injustice was self-inflicted.
Alessio Vinci in CNN [2]"Serb protests echo Milosevic era"
The melancholic Serb music, the firebrand speeches and the flags
gave the sense of a nation at odds with the rest of the world, a
victim of an incredible injustice.
It was very much a gathering aimed at showing Serb unity, but the
nationalist element was very much present.
Tomislav Nikolic, the ultranationalist leader who narrowly lost a
presidential election a few weeks ago was there. And so was Vojslav
Kostunica, the Serbian prime minister, who led anti-Milosevic
demonstrations in 2000 without ever being a big fan of the West.
"For as long as we live, Kosovo will be in Serbia!" he told the
crowd. These could have been Milosevic's words of a decade ago.
The Serbian government organized the rally to show the world Serb
indignation and anger at Kosovo's unilateral declaration of
independence. People arrived from all over Serbia also thanks to
free transport, including trains and buses.
Serb officials have been consistent in saying that they will
challenge Kosovo's independence politically and diplomatically, and
ruled out any use of force.
But images of the burning U.S. Embassy in Belgrade are making that
effort, already pretty much a lost cause, much harder. Indeed
Serbia's pro-West president Boris Tadic reacted saying that
violence is putting Kosovo further away from Serbia, not closer.
Yet one cannot ignore the inadequate security that Serb officials
put in place to protect sensitive sites at a time of high tension
and passion. On Sunday, hours after Kosovo declared independence,
Serb riot police fought pitch battles with thugs and violent
demonstrators outside the U.S. compound as they tried to storm it a
first time.
Where were they Thursday night?..
Alan Sullivan at [3]Fresh Bilge:
The US Embassy in Belgrade has been sacked by an angry mob. The
building was unoccupied at the time; our courageous diplomats had
already fled. Embassies used to be regarded as sovereign territory
of nations that set them up. The US has shown little interest in
defending this principle in recent decades, so it gets easier and
easier for such outrages to occur.
Of course, the Kosovo border should have been redrawn before the
independence declaration. Now thereâs no telling what will happen.
It is well to remember where World War One began.
Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. - [4]BUSH ADMINISTRATION UNITES WITH AL QAEDA
IN KOSOVO
The turmoil in Kosovo began in 1989 when Slovodan Milosevic,
president of Serbia and the Free Republic of Yugoslavia, set out to
create a greater Serbia by annexing Kosovo. When the Kosovo
assembly approved this measure, ethnic Albanians (the sanitized way
of saying native Muslims) rebelled. In 1990 Milosevic dispatched
troops into Kosovo to squelch the rebellion and restore order. In
1992, the ethnic Albanians responded to this military measure by
establishing their own government in Kosovo - - the Republic of
Kosovo - - with self proclaimed pacifist Ibrahim Rugova as its
president.
With two governments in one tiny country, the situation quickly
became downright ugly. In 1993 Milosevic ordered the arrest of
thirty ethnic Albanians for planning an armed uprising. In 1995 a
Serbian court sentenced sixty-eight members of Rugova's government
to prison for setting up a parallel police force. ..
To aid in the struggle for independence, the ethnic Albanians
turned to Osama bin Laden and the mujahadeen. Muslim warriors from
Chechnya, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia traveled in droves to Kosovo. By
1995 more than sixty thousand holy warriors, including members of
al Qaeda, had made their way to the Balkans to prepare for the
struggle against Milosevic and the Christian Serbs.
So, if the ethnic Albanians "provoked" the Serbs, then why did the
Milosevic's JNA and militia forces use their military superiority to
[5]trash Croatia? And why did the Croatians respond by trashing the
Serbs, killing 14,000 Serb civilians, looting Serb property, and
killing and mutilating Serb civilians?
What would have happened if American and the international community
had done nothing? How far would the fighting have spread?
Muslim terrorism/fascism is a threat because theyâre fighting us with
the equivalent of bearskins and knives, yet they manage to terrify
millions. Theyâve only gotten as far as they have because so very few
people want to fight them. This terrorism and fascism is also a threat
because it may provoke a European reaction. When Europeans decide to
fight, they tend to vote for groups that, to most American eyes, look
fairly fascist.
When Europeans put their minds to it, they have a history of being
more aggressive than any other culture on earth. When the Euros get
their game going, more often than not, the Balkans tend to be at the
epicenter of the worst of it. That may be one reason why we originally
felt the need to intervene.
While the majority of American conservatives do not lean towards
fascism, for some reason that I can't begin to fathom, some previously
reasonable American conservatives are leaning towards the idea that
the best way to fight Islamist-fascism is to ally with Eurofascism.
In the comment's section at AtlasShrugs, a [6]supporter of the Serbian
point of view said:
What would you do if someone from another country came to your
home...tossed you out, placed soldiers in your backyard to keep you
from your home.........and then gave your home and all your
belongings to a terrorist group based thousands of mile away? Would
you merely accept it? Would you consider those who stole your land
to be friends? "YOU ARE EITHER WITH US OR AGAINST US!!"
I responded:
Yeah cry me a river. This is the old whiny bully routine - hit me
in face, then cry about how victimized you are. It the old sad song
that terrorists like the Palestinians and their Islamist supporters
have been playing so well.
So who am I WITH or AGAINST? I'm against the whiny bullies.
References
1. http://www.slate.com/id/2184997/pagenum/all/#page_start
2. http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/02/22/serbia.demos/
3. http://www.seablogger.com/?p=10093#more-10093
4. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/02/exclusive-paul.html
5. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/yugo-hist4.htm
6. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/02/exclusive-paul.html#comments
More information about the whataretheysaying
mailing list