[whataretheysaying] Mary Madigan: Exasperation
Email subscription to blog articles
whataretheysaying at lists.powerblogs.com
Tue Sep 19 11:00:51 EDT 2006
Posted by Mary Madigan:
Exasperation
http://whataretheysaying.powerblogs.com/posts/1158678024.shtml
The Christian Science Monitor writes on [1]"Avoiding Religious Slings
and Arrows"
..bridge-building between Christians and Muslims would certainly be
easier if both sides in this case took more care. The Pope's talk
could have been more sensitive. For instance, in its denunciation
of violence as a means of religious conversion - certainly a valid
warning - it singled out Islam, never mentioning Christianity's own
historic failings. And the talk played down the stature of the
Koran's message of no religious compulsion by inaccurately placing
it in time.
Meanwhile, Muslim reaction in some quarters reinforces the image of
a violent, intolerant religion. Palestinians attacked several
churches. Demonstrators in India and Iraq burned an effigy of the
pope. A Somali cleric said anyone who offends Muhammad should be
"killed on the spot," and shortly after a nun in that country was
shot and killed.
So, the problem is, the Christian side should have been more
'sensitive' and the Muslim side shouldn't have murdered the nun,
burned 7 churches and threatened to kill the Pope?
Jesus Christ.
Islamist actions aren't meant to provoke an interfaith dialogue. Their
goal is to exert political dominance; to show Muslims and all the
world that they are more powerful than the law, the government and the
Vatican.
They also want to prove that they dominate the press but that's so
obvious they hardly have to bother.
If we react with apologies and appeasement, we may, if we grovel
enough, temporarily soothe their manufactured outrage. But we're also
know that we're encouraging the next batch of manufactured violence
and outrage, which is always right around the corner. Because the
Danish Cartoons, flushed Korans, Papal quotes, etc. aren't the issue.
The Islamists' ability to dominate us is.
We're not going to win the war on terrorism until we can win the
dominance game - we need to show Muslims and the rest of the world
that we're more powerful than the Islamists. We don't need guns or
even rotten tomatoes to do it. All we have to do is refuse to
[2]grovel, soothe and appease in response to their violent actions.
Here's one of the few grovel-free responses out there, from
[3]Australian Prime Minister John Howard:
Muslims protesting over the Pope's comments that offended Islam are
overreacting and should move on, Prime Minister John Howard says...
.."My, I suppose, exasperation, would be that of many people in
Australia that OK, they may not like what his holiness said - and
whether he should have said it or not is in a sense beside the
point - but we are meant to believe in free speech and we are meant
to not overreact.
"It's very important with these things that people don't
overreact."
Mr Howard said Cardinal Pell had acted appropriately in defending
the head of his church and would not have intended to insult
anyone.
"I think we should all take a deep breath in these things and all
have a sense of proportion," he said.
"We seem to be living in a world where people have no sense of
proportion.
"OK, they don't like what was said.
"I'm sure the Pope was not intending to attack Islam, he's
expressed his regrets and I think we should really move on."
His comments echo those of leading Australian Muslim leader, Dr
Ameer Ali, who said on Tuesday that Australian Muslims must accept
the Pope's apology and move on..
Why isn't everyone saying that? It's common sense, it puts things in
perspective and its just not that hard.
References
1. http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060919/cm_csm/epope
2. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/16/opinion/16sat2.html?ex=1316059200&en=55dd46982dc29167&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
3. http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=145763
More information about the whataretheysaying
mailing list