[whataretheysaying] Mary Madigan: How the Democrats could (accidentally) save the world
Email subscription to blog articles
whataretheysaying at lists.powerblogs.com
Wed Nov 1 12:22:30 EST 2006
Posted by Mary Madigan:
How the Democrats could (accidentally) save the world
http://whataretheysaying.powerblogs.com/posts/1162401330.shtml
crazyGore
I support strong public schools, welfare, gay rights and the
legalization of marijuana. I should be a Democrat. For most of my
life, I was. I used [1]Dave's method of reasonably evaluating
candidates and picked Democrats every time. Voting was easy.
There was one catch - I also support military and self defense. Before
9/11, that wasn't much of an issue. Afterwards, it was. In 2002, I
wrote this post, explaining to my daughter how I could have broken
with family tradition and all that we held holy by voting [2]for one
Republican:
I continued to vote for Republicans because most didn't treat the
other party as 'the enemy'. They appeared to be looking for the
quickest path out of the mess we found ourselves in and they appeared
to be as level-headed as Rudy was.
That was then, this is now. There is only one Rudy Giuliani, and I'll
vote for him in 2008 whether he runs or not, but since we're talking
about this election...
Iraq was not the quickest path out the mess we found ourselves in. The
quickest path would have been to acknowledge that our wealthy and
generous Gulf allies are supporting terrorism; as supporters of
terrorism they are our enemies. But, since our leaders, Republicans
and Democrats, are addicted to their [3]habit of feeding at the
bountiful Gulf oil trough, most politicians will never acknowledge
that.
Their fellow hogs in the media and academia won't either.
As things stand now, it's unlikely that we will find a political or
miltary means for fighting the worldwide terrorist infrastructure
because many of our "allies" support of that infrastructure. You can't
fight a war if you're allied with your enemy.
So, for this election, I'm returning to my old habit of voting on
social issues, for Democrats*. This may, inadvertently, be a good
thing. About 99% of Americans believe that our reliance on oil,
especially foreign oil, is a major problem. The Dems have a reputation
of wanting to do something about this. They certainly have no
intention of drying up their supply of Saudi cash, or of defending
innocent lives that are currently threatened by petrodollar-supported
terrorism. Instead, Democrats want to cater to [4]the
environmentalists and PETA loons in their midst. Whatever. They are,
unintentionally, doing the right thing.
In this election, that's as good as it gets.
[* except for the corrupt [5]Robert Menendez (D-NJ)]
References
1. http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1162346557.shtml
2. http://www.whataretheysaying.org/archives/2002_11_08.html#82368810
3. http://whataretheysaying.powerblogs.com/posts/1162241658.shtml
4. http://www.climatecrisis.net/
5. http://politicalwire.com/archives/2006/09/08/feds_probe_menendez_rental_deal.html
More information about the whataretheysaying
mailing list