[thenightwriterblog] The Night Writer: FAGS fighting back
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Tue Nov 6 14:38:46 EST 2007
Posted by The Night Writer:
FAGS fighting back
http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1194377921.shtml
Don't look at me like that. In this case FAGS stands for Fight Against
Government Suppression, and is the name of an English political party
established by pub-owner Hamish Howitt, the first pub-owner in England
to be prosecuted for violating the country's new smoking ban for pubs
and restaurants. Howitt, a non-smoker himself, pleaded guilty but vows
to continue to allow smoking in his pub and to not pay the fines.
From [1]Scotsman.com:
I'll still ignore smoking ban, vows publican fined £500
KIM PILLING
A SCOTTISH pub landlord vowed yesterday to continue to allow his
customers to flout the smoking ban in England after being fined for
offences at his bar in Blackpool.
Hamish Howitt, 55, who was born in Glasgow, was fined £500 and
ordered to pay £2,000 prosecution costs after he admitted flouting
the ban, which was introduced in England in July.
The owner of the Happy Scots Bar is the first publican south of the
Border to be convicted of breaching the law. Howitt, a non-smoker,
has been a staunch critic of the ban and set up a political party
called Fight Against Government Suppression, or FAGS.
However, District Judge Peter Ward, sentencing Howitt at Blackpool
Magistrates' Court, said his campaign had been "silly, misguided
and pointless".
Granted, it's not exactly William Wallace mooning the Brits, but
Howitt has definitely set out to pick a fight as the signage on the
outside walls of his pub demonstrate in these Flickr photos [2]here
and [3]here. (Normally I would download the images and post them here
rather than poaching bandwidth by linking to the site but the images
are copyrighted and I don't want to stretch the "fair-use" doctrine,
especially when I don't know who to credit for the originals).
Howitt doesn't risk losing his head (merely his pub license) for his
violations, though judging by the comments from readers at the end of
the article, there are some who wouldn't mind seeing him drawn and
quartered.
As a dedicated non-smoker myself (never smoked, in fact) and someone
who has deliberately avoided public places that are too smokey, I
nevertheless side with the rights of private property owners to manage
their legal businesses (and customers using legal products) as they
see fit, free from government encroachment, especially when dubious
science is involved. (I'm sure it won't be long before some study
links the number of smokers being forced outside to man-made global
warming.)
References
1. http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1761792007
2. http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1678685089&size=o
3. http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1678682923&size=o
More information about the thenightwriterblog
mailing list