[speedgibson] Speed Gibson: Accepting the Blame

Email subscription to blog articles speedgibson at lists.powerblogs.com
Thu Dec 6 22:58:28 EST 2007


Posted by Speed Gibson:
Accepting the Blame
http://speedgibson.powerblogs.com/posts/1196999902.shtml


   Brad Brown, Lynne Osterman and Robin Smothers were the chairs of this
   year's "Vote Yes - Be a Hero" District 281 referendum committee. They
   wrote a rather acrimonious guest column in the December 6 Sun Post.
   They are too quick to blame others for the defeat and I conclude a bit
   too unwilling to examine their own performance.

     We know that many people who support public education were deceived
     by the blitzkrieg of disinformation sent out by referendum
     opponents in the last two days before the election. Even though it
     is too late to change the outcome of the election, those false
     claims are damaging to the students, staff, and parents of the
     district, and must be corrected.

   Blitzkrieg? Like it would have passed otherwise? First of all, I
   received nothing from the "vote no" forces, not even a phone call.
   Given their limited finances, it was hardly unexpected that they would
   spend most of it in the last few days. Were they the difference? We
   have no good way of knowing. Were their claims false? Let's see. I'm
   accepting their characterization of the "false claims" at face value.

     False claim: Robbinsdale students are not learning and perform
     worse than students in other districts.
     The facts: Robbinsdale Area School's students score higher than
     state and national averages on the ACT college entrance exam.
     Seventy more students took the ACT this school year than the
     previous. Districtwide, students met No Child Left Behind targets
     in 429 of 463 separate demographic categories for a 93 percent
     success rate.

   The claim is admittedly a broad brush, but the facts cited are far too
   specific to address how 281 compares to other districts overall. I'm
   sure that the other districts could make similar specific claims.

     False claim: Robbinsdale wastes taxpayer dollars.
     The facts: The district spends 96 cents of every dollar it receives
     on instruction, student-support services and facilities and just 4
     cents of each dollar on administration. In the last two years,
     administration expenses have been cut by $260,000. The district has
     cut $7.3 million in programs and services over the past seven
     years, closed an elementary school, and sold three surplus
     buildings, reinvesting the capital dollars in building renovations.
     The district cannot, by state law, use the proceeds from the sale
     of school buildings for operating expenses.

   Everyone unit of government wastes taxpayer dollars so the claim is
   certainly not false. But is the waste significant? This answer
   provides no clue one way or another, and falsely implies that
   administration is waste. Maybe 281 needs more administration, not
   less, to solve its problems.

     False claim: Robbinsdale recruits students from outside the
     district at district taxpayer expense.
     The facts: The district does not actively recruit open-enrollment
     students. However, last year, Robbinsdale Area Schools 1,304
     students from other districts chose to open-enroll into our
     district. The result was a net financial gain of $1.3 million.
     Transportation for students that open-enroll in our district is not
     paid for by the district.

   If Open Enrollment brings net money into the District as they say, why
   wouldn't 281 recruit such students given its currently under-utilized
   facilities? District 286 (Brooklyn Center) actively recruits for the
   same reason and makes no secret of it. The word "actively" in the
   response is curious. Does 281 "passively" recruit? With an Open
   Enrollment of 10%, it would seem so. If anything, the claim would
   appear to be true to some extent.

     To voters who voted "Yes," we thank you for your support of our
     students and teachers; and to those who voted "No," we want you to
     know that we will work diligently to show you that our students and
     teachers truly are worthy of your support in the future. Contrary
     to the message of the anti-public school organization, education is
     never a waste.

   You don't me to fisk this Parthian shot. It does illustrate part of
   the attitude problem that is making it difficult to get this
   referendum passed.



More information about the speedgibson mailing list