[donaldscrankshaw] Donald: A blogger's moral dilemma
Email subscription to blog articles
donaldscrankshaw at lists.powerblogs.com
Thu Apr 24 23:45:02 EDT 2008
Posted by Donald:
A blogger's moral dilemma
http://www.donaldscrankshaw.com/posts/1209095096.shtml
So, let me pose a moral dilemma. As you may know, I use Sitemeter for
my blog. This feature-rich webcounter allows me to do all sorts of
things. For one, it keeps track of where visitors are coming from
(their IP addresses, ISPs, and location) and what brought them here
(links from other locations, web searches--what's called referrals). I
like taking a peek at this information, especially the referrals,
since it lets me see who's linking to me and what web searches bring
people here. Probably the most interesting category are the web
searches. Some people, after coming here for a web search, find
exactly the right thing. If you're looking for information on
[1]Ezekiel's vision or the [2]difference between Evangelicalism and.
Fundamentalism, I've got you covered. Sometimes, though, the weirdest
searches lead people to things that I've never talked about before.
For example, "[3]Did Jesus ride a unicorn to Babylon?" I'd never
addressed that question before someone's search led them here. All
that really means is that I had the terms Jesus, unicorn, and Babylon
on the same archive page at one point.
And then, there are the searches that are frankly disturbing. Some
time ago, I noticed a someone coming to my blog via a search of
something like "How do I kill my roommate?" Now, obviously I don't
have any instructions on roommate killing on my blog. The question,
though, is what should I do with a search like this? On the one hand,
I could just respect my visitor's privacy and ignore it. People do
crazy searches all the time. As a writer of suspense stories, I do
more than most: I once spent several hours doing web searches on
stabbing people in the lungs. It's possible that the visitor was doing
something similar, or academic research on the availability of such
information on the internet. Do I really wish to impugn someone's
reputation, or land him [generic masculine pronoun here--it could have
been a woman] in serious legal trouble, based on a web search? On the
other hand, if he's really looking for a way to kill someone, wouldn't
I be morally responsible if I had the ability to prevent it and failed
to do so? I do have that means, after all. Sitemeter tells me when he
made the search, the IP address of the computer he made it from, and
his ISP, in this case a university in another country. All I have to
do is inform the university, and they can probably tell who made the
search via who was logged into that computer at that time. So what do
I do?
As I said, this happened some time ago, so I made the decision within
a few hours of noticing the search:
([4]show)
I did, in fact, notify the university via their internet abuse
notification website. I made it clear that I had no knowledge of
whether the visitor to my site had actual illegal intent, and that the
search could be entirely innocent. If they did their jobs properly,
they would have checked to see whether that student had a history of
disciplinary problems or if there had been reports of difficulties
between him and his roommate, and maybe talked to the two of them.
Then again, they could have just ignored my report. Or they could have
overreacted and expelled him or charged him with conspiracy to commit
murder or something. I'm hoping they did their jobs properly, but it
was out of my hands at that point.
([5]hide)
So, did I do the right thing? I'm pretty sure I did, but I would love
to hear the thoughts of others.
References
1. http://www.donaldscrankshaw.com/posts/1180130374.shtml
2. http://www.donaldscrankshaw.com/posts/1083614605.shtml
3. http://www.donaldscrankshaw.com/posts/1163135685.shtml
4. file://localhost/var/www/powerblogs/donaldscrankshaw/posts/1209095096.html
5. file://localhost/var/www/powerblogs/donaldscrankshaw/posts/1209095096.html
More information about the donaldscrankshaw
mailing list