[Dean's World] Dean: Dean's World Line In The Sand: Make A Choice
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Tue Feb 27 19:19:26 EST 2007
Posted by Dean:
Dean's World Line In The Sand: Make A Choice
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1172621961.shtml
Back in the 1950s William F. Buckley Jr. conducted a purge in the
ranks of his young publication, The National Review. He was running a
conservative publication at a time when conservative publications were
not respected and were thus by nature low-circulation. In those
circumstances it would be hard to stand on principal and refuse to
associate with certain parties just because it might provide
short-term gain.
Buckley refused to align his publication with elements on the right
that were excessively hateful, rabidly racist, or just plain nuts. The
whole thing came to a head when Buckley one day drew a line in the
sand:
You could either be a John Birch Society supporter, or you could write
for the National Review.
One or the other. Period.
This is a minor correction to my friend Ron Coleman's earlier article
by the way. It was not anti-semites he threw off his publication,
although he was no anti-semite and hired many Jews. No, it was radical
frothing nutjobs who saw Communist conspiracies everywhere. Buckley
was staunchly anti-Communist, but would not align himself with people
who saw everything as a Communist plot.
Today [1]National Review is still one of the most respected
conservative intellectual journals. The [2]John Birch Society is
rightly remembered as a bunch of right-wing nutjob conspiracy
theorists.
Not that the National Review is the greatest publication in the
history of the universe, but it's a venerable and respectable
institution that's made a difference in the world. I find the example
inspiring.
And, having wearied of fighting every day against Islamophobic fools
on Dean's World and other places, only to have people ridiculously
deny the very possibility that there could be any such thing as
Islamophobia even when the evidence is presented them full in the
face, I've decided to draw a similar line in the sand:
You can be an Islamophobe, or you can write for Dean's World. You
cannot do both.
This is meant for front-page contributors, submitters, or even
commenters. It is time for you to make a choice, and to live by that
choice. Because I certainly intend to.
Simply put, you must agree with all of the following:
1) Islam does not represent the forces of Satan or the Anti-Christ
bent on destruction of the Christian world. 2) There is no 1,400 year
old "war with the West/Christianity" being waged by Muslims or anyone
else. 3) Islam as a religion is no more inherently incompatible with
modernity, minority rights, women's rights, or democratic pluralism
than most religions. 4) Medieval terms like "dhimmitude" or "taqiyya"
are suitable for polite intellectual discussion. They are not and
never will be appropriate to slap in the face of everyday Muslims. 5)
Muslims have absolutely no need to prove that they can be good
Americans, loyal citizens, decent people, or enemies of terrorism than
anyone else does.
Is this a test of "ideological purity?"
Why yes. Yes it is.
If you cannot accept, wholeheartedly, all of the above 6
assertions--without exception or weasel-wording--then if you are a
front page Dean's World contributor you should turn in your keys and
say goodbye. You can do it gracefully or ingracefully. You can do it
by email or by posting whatever you want on the front page. Your
choice. But you need to do it: you need to leave.
Furthermore, I will accept no more debate upon this matter by
commenters bent upon snarky, snotty, Islamophobic irrationality. You
should either stop using your comment account, or you should be
prepared to simply be thrown out without further ado.
I'm done with this.
By the way, feel free to take me off your blogroll if you can't handle
this. Or to ask me to take you off of mine.
I'm done. Islamophobia has no more place in police society than any
other form of irrational hatred, and I will no longer be any part of
hosting discussions or "debates" with Islamophobes.
References
1. http://nationalreview.com/
2. http://www.jbs.org/
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list