[Dean's World] J.A. Eddy: Democrats, Congress and Netroots, Oh My!
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Wed Aug 22 15:02:49 EDT 2007
Posted by J.A. Eddy:
Democrats, Congress and Netroots, Oh My!
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1187809358.shtml
Well, since nobody else is willing to post today I guess itâs up to
me. A couple of posts have caught my eye today, both from [1]InstaMan.
First, thereâs [2]this by Glenn Greenwald- he opines that the low
approval ratings of Congress are due to Democrat voters being upset
with the lack of substantive investigations of the Bush Administration
as well as the dearth of symbolic attempts to end the Iraq war. Heâs
got some numbers on his side and Iâm inclined to agree with portions
of his analysis, particularly the following:
But the reason for these low approval ratings is as clear as it is
meaningful -- the overall ratings for Congress are so low because
Democrats disapprove of the Democratic Congress almost as much as
Republicans do. There is nothing unusual about how Republicans or
independents rate the Democratic Congress; the only aspect of any
of this that is unusual is that Democrats rate the Congress so low
even though it is controlled by their own party. Virtually every
poll demonstrates this. (Emphasis is Glennâs)
Essentially he argues that if Democratâs approved of Congress the same
way Republicans approve of Bush the numbers for congressional approval
would be much better. I think he goes off the deep end when he opines
that an overwhelming percentage of the population wants in-depth
investigations of the Presidency, but given his ideological leanings I
see why he believes it.
The comments are the real gold mine here. They remind me of Limbaugh
castigating the Republican majority back in the Clinton years. Lots of
déjà vu there.
This is followed up by a post at [3]Cadillac Tight regarding a
purported netroots mobilization targeting Blue Dog Democrats (or âBush
Dogâ Democratsâ as they are called by the folks at [4]OpenLeft). Joe
at Cadillac Tight notes:
Twenty-six out of thirty-eight (68%) of these targeted Democrats
are from Southern or Southeastern regions, which makes sense, since
itâs primarily Blue Dogs weâre talking about here. That makes this
another netroots war against regions of the country that elect
these Democrats precisely because they are Blue Dogs. Itâs obvious
when you read netroots diaries that there is a lot of disdain for
and rage against Democratic voters who donât identify with the
progressive movement, and efforts like this one by Stoller and
Bowers (Northeastern liberals both) only serve to highlight that
disdain and rage. Rather than âpunishingâ the Blue Dogs, the New
Democrats, or the voters who elect them, the Democratic party is
likely to be punished itself at the polls if this effort becomes
associated with the party, rather than the progressives.
Writing off the South has never proven to be a winning strategy for
Democrats. Even given the results of last yearâs election, itâs
unlikely to be one in the future.
Now, give the guys at [5]OpenLeft a little credit, as they are calling
for criticism of the Blue Dogs and other conservative democrats in
Congress as an attempt to correct their behavior; however, the threat
is clear that they would like progressive candidates to challenge
these Democrats in the Primaries. It worked so well in Connecticut,
after allâ¦
Wishful thinking on one side, self-destructive behavior on the other-
Iâm with Glenn Reynolds: the Democrats and the netroots are trying to
outstrip the Republicans in stupidity and willful ignorance. Iâd be
laughing if this wasnât such a critical time in need of truly rational
thought from our political leadership.
References
1. http://www.instapundit.com/
2. http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2007/08/21/congress/index.html
3. http://cadillactight.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/openleft-directs-netroots-fire-at-conservative-democrats/
4. http://dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/22/94647/5187
5. http://openleft.com/
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list