[Dean's World] Aziz P: Skeptical about NK nukes
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Mon Oct 9 16:33:36 EDT 2006
Posted by Aziz P:
Skeptical about NK nukes
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1160426013.shtml
my feeling is that the nuke tested by NK was a fake, or at best a dud.
Thats not wishful thinking; I am getting it from [1]here and [2]here.
Keep in mind that NK's entire strategy has been to rattle the cage and
scream. Then the various powers that be give it a bribe to shut up for
a time. They need to continually up the ante to maintain this strategy
- so the suggestion that they have a weapon is more important and
valuable to them than the actual weapon (sort of teh inverse of the
Israeli position of actually being in possession but never
acknowledging it officially).
NK is a pile of independent mini fiefdoms run by local power
apparatchiks. As [3]James Fallows writes in a must-read piece, NK is
likely following the standard Seven Stages of Collapse:
Phase One: resource depletion;
Phase Two: the failure to maintain infrastructure around the
country because of resource depletion;
Phase Three: the rise of independent fiefs informally controlled by
local party apparatchiks or warlords, along with widespread
corruption to circumvent a failing central government;
Phase Four: the attempted suppression of these fiefs by the KFR
once it feels that they have become powerful enough;
Phase Five: active resistance against the central government;
Phase Six: the fracture of the regime; and
Phase Seven: the formation of new national leadership.
North Korea probably reached Phase Four in the mid-1990s, but was
saved by subsidies from China and South Korea, as well as by famine
aid from the United States. It has now gone back to Phase Three.
The whole government there exists for one reason: to maintain the
power and lifestyle of their <0.0001 % elite. Jong Il is a classic
buffoon - he's the Zaphod Beeblebrox figure, the guy who wields
ostensible power to draw attention away from those who really do.
The only reason that NK gets the bribes is because Seaoul is a
hostage. And 20+ million semi-starved peasants who become Somebody's
Else's Problem should the regime fail.
And it amazes me that people think that a nation that looks like a
[4]prehistoric wasteland from space at night can actually maintain the
infrastructure required for nuclear weapons. Anyone with a glimmer of
understanding about what it takes to manufacture a working weapon
should be incredibly skeptical.
What do we do, then? Perhaps surprisingly to some of you, I think
there wasn't much else we could do. So I don't fault the Bush
Administration for yesterday's events. We need to stop giving the NK
its bribes, and ride out the ensuing collapse. But we need to be frank
about the fact that the collapse is coming and put into place some
preparation for it, something that the present Administration is
probably not going to do given its preoccupation with other messes of
its own making.
So we have to wait until new leadership in 2008 and hope that NK's
feeble society can still keep itself somewhat together for another
decade while we get ready for the biggest humanitarian crisis in Asia
that looms on the horizon.
References
1. http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/55394#1457219
2. http://redstate.com/stories/war/the_only_conversation_that_matters_this_week#comment-330870
3. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200610/kaplan-korea
4. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/dprk/dprk-dark.htm
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list