[Dean's World] Dave Price: Straight Reporting and Strait Jackets
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Mon Nov 20 16:24:50 EST 2006
Posted by Dave Price:
Straight Reporting and Strait Jackets
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1164057886.shtml
Michael Fumento returns to [1]Ramadi, and [2]finds progress.
And from what I found, we are defeating them. It's painfully slow,
and our men there are still dying in inordinate numbers from a
broad variety of attacks. But a multitude of factors, including
tribal cooperation, the continual introduction of more Iraqi army
and police, the beginning of public works projects, the building of
more Forward Operating Bases (FOBs), the installation of more small
operational posts (OPs), and plunking down company-sized Combat
Operation Posts (COPs) smack in the middle of hostile territory are
destroying both the size and the mobility of the enemy. This time
the rats are dying in place.
...
Historically, successful counterinsurgency efforts have involved
pacifying areas by plopping small garrisons with interlocking
communications into enemy territory and sending out patrols to
gather information and engage the enemy.
...
The military refers to COP use as "the inkblot strategy." One dot
spreads into a bigger spot. Further, the troops are practically
forced to work with the locals. That means building up networks of
indigenous people who know the terrain, culture, and other people
better than any forces--even one from the same country but another
province--ever could. This also allows for more direct contact
between the leader of the military force and the local leadership.
All of this creates a force multiplier.
This seems to augur well for the military effort. That strategy of
expanding by establishing small, mutually-supporting garrisons is
time-tested over millennia and depends only on the will of the
conquering force to endure.
We badly need more of this kind of on-the-ground reporting, so be sure
to [3]send a donation to Bill Ardolino to help send him on his way
(the link says Moonbat Research Fund, but I haven't seen any
insurgents [4]in pink bodysuits yet; maybe Bill will find some).
Also worth reading: Arthur Herman [5]argues that Iran's trump card in
its drive to acquire nuclear weapons is the threat is to the Straits
of Hormuz, through which 40% of the world's oil passes. He outlines a
very plausible scenario, reminiscent of [6]Operation Praying Mantis,
under which the U.S. could, with mostly air and sea resources (very
little of which are tied down in Iraq), seize control of the straits
and at the same time cut off the font of the regime's power, grinding
their military and economy to a halt without a ground war, potentially
leading to revolution that would eliminate the need for externally
executed regime change (relevant excerpt below the jump).
([7]show)
Our next step would be to declare a halt to all shipments of
Iranian oil while guaranteeing the safety of tankers carrying
non-Iranian oil and the platforms of other Gulf states. We would
then guarantee this guarantee by launching a comprehensive air
campaign aimed at destroying Iranâs air-defense system, its
air-force bases and communications systems, and finally its missile
sites along the Gulf coast. At that point the attack could move to
include Iranâs nuclear facilitiesânot only the âhardâ sites but
also infrastructure like bridges and tunnels in order to prevent
the shifting of critical materials from one to site to another.
Above all, the air attack would concentrate on Iranâs gasoline
refineries. It is still insufficiently appreciated that Iran, a
huge oil exporter, imports nearly 40 percent of its gasoline from
foreign sources, including the Gulf states. With its refineries
gone and its storage facilities destroyed, Iranâs cars, trucks,
buses, planes, tanks, and other military hardware would run dry in
a matter of weeks or even days. This alone would render impossible
any major countermoves by the Iranian army. (For its part, the
Iranian navy is aging and decrepit, and its biggest asset, three
Russian-made Kilo-class submarines, should and could be destroyed
before leaving port.)
The scenario would not end here. With the systematic reduction of
Iranâs capacity to respond, an amphibious force of Marines and
special-operations forces could seize key Iranian oil assets in the
Gulf, the most important of which is a series of 100 offshore wells
and platforms built on Iranâs continental shelf. North and South
Pars offshore fields, which represent the future of Iranâs oil and
natural-gas industry, could also be seized, while Kargh Island at
the far western edge of the Persian Gulf, whose terminus pumps the
oil from Iranâs most mature and copiously producing fields (Ahwaz,
Marun, and Gachsaran, among others), could be rendered virtually
useless. By the time the campaign was over, the United States
military would be in a position to control the flow of Iranian oil
at the flick of a switch.
([8]hide)
This option has a lot of appeal; the reliance on exporting oil is
certainly Iran's Achilles heel. Of course, the obvious problem is what
cutting off Iranian oil would do to world petroleum prices -- but
Iran's government is almost totally dependent on that oil money and
would likely either capitulate quickly or be overthrown, and [9]it may
be less of an issue soon anyway. Is a free (or at least
nuclear-weapons-free) Iran worth a painful but probably short-term
bump in oil prices?
References
1. http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2726055
2. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/985qugel.asp
3. http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/002816.php
4. http://www.indcjournal.com/archives/001048.php
5. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=12204030_1
6. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Praying_Mantis
7. file://localhost/var/www/powerblogs/deanesmay/posts/1164057886.html
8. file://localhost/var/www/powerblogs/deanesmay/posts/1164057886.html
9. http://instapundit.com/archives2/2006/11/post_443.php
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list