[Dean's World] Dean: Chronicles of Narnia
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Sun Jun 4 17:06:48 EDT 2006
Posted by Dean:
Chronicles of Narnia
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1149455204.shtml
We finally got around to renting [1]Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion,
the Witch, and the Wardrobe.
The cinematography was gorgeous. The special effects quite beautiful.
The story and characters... meh. The Queen fell asleep in the middle
of it, and our 8 year old son Jake got bored in the middle and
wandered off to watch cartoons in his bedroom. I'm the only one who
made it all the way through the movie.
I think they did as good a job as they could with the material, but
that the material is weak. I always thought so, from the first time I
read the Narnia books at the age of 14. Dramatically, things happen in
them because they just happen. People become close friends
immediately, and the enemies are bad just because they're bad. Very
little is dramatically revealed, things just plod along on a sort of
obvious predetermined path. No one and nothing has any depth. The most
interesting character is Aslan, and if he were a man and not a giant
talking lion, we'd be mystified as to why we cared about him at all.
Compared to J.R.R. Tolkien's books, it's clear that Narnia is inferior
in just about every way. My saying so may surprise some people, for
I've often written that I don't much care for Tolkien's work either.
But the reasons are entirely different, and have more to do with the
style of his prose than what's at its core. My lack of enthusiasm for
Tolkein can be summed up as: I take no pleasure in reading three pages
of action crammed into every 20 pages of scenery. I recognize that
some people fall into this lush descriptive prose and wallow in it
happily, but I don't. Nevertheless I recognize the depth of the
mythology that Tolkien created, and why people love the books so much.
I enjoyed the Lord of the Rings movies quite a bit more than the
books. In the end, the writers of the Lord of the Rings movies had
much more to work with: there's just so much there, and the depths of
it are almost bottomless.
There's no such luxury with Narnia. There's a sort of emptiness at the
center of all C.S. Lewis's stories and characters. There's no "there"
there. Neither very good allegory, nor very good fantasy, we have no
reason to love the characters or hate them. They're just sort of
there. Things just sort of happen, and when they're over, they're
done, and the whole thing comes off as very parochial.
Adam Gopnik of the New Yorker wrote an excellent summation of C.S.
Lewis, his life and his work, here: [2]Prisoner of Narnia: How C.S.
Lewis Escaped. It pretty well sums up my feelings on the man and his
work.
I understand that the same creative team who made this Narnia movie
plan on going on to produce the rest of the books. The Lion, the
Witch, and the Wardrobe is only book one of seven. My prediction: just
as each book in the series gets less and less interesting, so too will
the movies, and interest will drop off with each subsequent sequel.
Indeed, I bet they never get to the 7th and last movie, because by
then most people will just be too bored.
References
1. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000E8M0VA/qid=1149452332/sr=1-3/ref=sr_1_3/102-2442798-4236140?s=dvd&v=glance&n=130/deansworld01-20
2. http://www.newyorker.com/critics/atlarge/articles/051121crat_atlarge
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list