[Dean's World] Dave Price: Glimpses of MSM Sanity
notify at powerblogs.com
notify at powerblogs.com
Wed Apr 26 11:46:34 EDT 2006
Posted by Dave Price:
Glimpses of MSM Sanity
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1146066385.shtml
An [1]editorial from the primary news source of my pre-Internet days,
the Chicago Tribune:
The bombing of the Shiite al-Askari shrine in February brought
furious reprisals. The attack also exposed the insurgents'
strategy: divide and conquer. Exploit simmering ethnic and
religious tensions. Make sure a free and democratic Iraq never
rises.
Internecine killing continues, of course, whether it's called a
civil war or something else. But Iraq now has a new prime
minister-designate, Jawad al-Maliki, and a top leadership
representing all of the people. Most important, its leaders appear
to have learned the most necessary art in a democracy: compromise.
...
In a country without a long history of democratic traditions or
institutions, a country strafed by a violent insurgency and
struggling to find its national voice, this is a hopeful day. Just
as sure, this is a grim day for the insurgents, a day that they had
hoped to derail. A unified, free and democratic Iraq is what they
fear most.
Glad to see at least one major MSM editorial board has a grasp on
reality and understands what really motivates our enemies, unlike some
[2]others who seem to think the rationale for fighting them is merely
a risible sound bite.
And from Foreign Affairs, a rational [3]look at why so many people
believed Saddam had WMD, and why the regime never came clean despite
the consequences:
...he decided to save the air force for future needs and ordered
his commanders to hide their aircraft. This decision was yet
another indication that Saddam did not believe coalition ground
forces would ever reach into the heart of Iraq. He was sure his
regime would survive whatever conflict ensued.
...
When it came to weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Saddam attempted
to convince one audience that they were gone while simultaneously
convincing another that Iraq still had them. Coming clean about WMD
and using full compliance with inspections to escape from sanctions
would have been his best course of action for the long run. Saddam,
however, found it impossible to abandon the illusion of having WMD,
especially since it played so well in the Arab world.
Taken together, those two facts explain the regime's behavior and give
the lie to leftist/Democrat claims that Bush misled Americans (as if
the consensus of the world intelligence community was not proof enough
of how disingenuous such attacks are).
Astonishingly enough, even near the end Saddam apparently believed he
was winning the war:
As late as March 30, Saddam thought that his strategy was working
and that the coalition offensive was grinding to a halt. On that
day, Lieutenant General Abed Hamid Mahmoud, Saddam's principal
secretary, directed the Iraqi foreign minister to tell the French
and Russian governments that Baghdad would accept only an
"unconditional withdrawal" of U.S. forces because "Iraq is now
winning and . . . the United States has sunk in the mud of defeat."
This behavior exemplifies why Saddam's regime needed to be removed
before he could attain a nuclear bluff. These are not rational people.
Had they acquired nuclear weapons and missiles capable of reaching
Europe (or even the perception of such) after the crumbling sanctions
regime collapsed, they would likely have rearmed and contemplated
invading both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia under the assumption the West
would not dare risk nuclear war by opposing the action militarily. And
they might have been right.
References
1. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0604240204apr24,0,3680133.story
2. http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20060407
3. http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060501faessay85301-p10/kevin-woods-james-lacey-williamson-murray/saddam-s-delusions-the-view-from-the-inside.html
More information about the Deanesmay
mailing list