[chessmind] Dennis Monokroussos: Anand's seconds, Part two
Email subscription to blog articles
chessmind at lists.powerblogs.com
Tue Oct 14 01:17:44 EDT 2008
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos:
Anand's seconds, Part two
http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1223961458.shtml
[1]As mentioned earlier today (yesterday by the time I finish this
post), Anand's four seconds for the match, starting in about nine
hours, are Peter Heine Nielsen, Rustam Kasimdzhanov, Radoslaw Wojtasek
and Surya Shekhar Ganguly. In this post, I'll take a look at their
repertoires, with an eye to seeing how in particular they might help
Anand battle Kramnik.
(1) Peter Heine Nielsen (FIDE Rating: 2662):
With White, Nielsen plays all four major moves, but prefers 1.d4 above
the rest. After 1...Nf6 2.c4 e6, Nielsen plays all three main moves
(3.Nf3, 3.Nc3 and 3.g3) in fairly equal proportion. Against the
Semi-Slav, he goes down the main lines and plays the Anti-Moscow
Gambit with 6.Bh4.
When he plays 1.e4, he plays conventional main lines. Interestingly,
he doesn't seem to have had much OTB experience against the Petroff,
but whatever might be lacking in his White games is made up when he
has Black - see below. His experience vs. the Sveshnikov is pretty
slim (one Bg5 Qa5+ Bd2 Qd8 draw); in the few relevant games, he
generally chose 3.Bb5 or 3.Nc3 followed by Bb5. As for the Berlin, he
hasn't faced it in 17 years.
With Black, Nielsen meets 1.e4 with both 1...c5 and 1...e5. Based on
his recent track records, it's unlikely that Kramnik will play 1.e4 or
meet that move with 1...c5, so let's concentrate on Nielsen's 1...e5
repertoire. He plays 2...Nc6 most often, but he's a regular exponent
of the Petroff as well, choosing the main line with 6...Nc6. In the
Ruy, he plays both 3...a6 (heading for both the Closed Main Line and
the Marshall) and 3...Nf6, the Berlin. His record with the Berlin is
pretty good, though not great, and he hasn't played it since 2005.
Still, it's likely that his years of playing it will put Anand in good
stead if Kramnik uses it.
Against 1.d4, Nielsen plays a bit of almost everything: King's Indian,
Nimzo-Indian, QGD (possibly his main opening), Slav and Semi-Slav.
(2) Rustam Kasimdzhanov (FIDE Rating: 2672):
With White, Kasimdzhanov plays both 1.e4 and 1.d4, with a slight
preference for the former. In his 1.e4 games, his record against the
Berlin isn't very good - he's -1 in 8 games - and in five of the eight
games he avoided the Berlin Endgame. Against the Petroff, he does go
for the main lines, though without particular success - 50% against
his fellow GMs. Against the Sicilian with 2...Nc6, Kasimdzhanov
generally avoids the Sveshnikov and plays 3.Bb5, with good results.
With 1.d4, he is willing to play both the QID and the Nimzo-Indian. As
for his record and experience against the Slav and Semi-Slav, he has
done extremely well against the former (+7 =4 against strong
opposition) but had mediocre results against the latter. He generally
played 5.e3, only taking up 5.Bg5 in 2007, so in comparison with
Anand, Kramnik and even Heine Nielsen he's a Johnny-come-lately to
that opening. (But see below.)
With Black, Kasimdzhanov meets 1.e4 with 1...e5 and 1...c5 with equal
frequency. He has never played the Berlin, preferring the Closed Main
Lines and the Marshall. Against 1.d4, he, like Heine Nielsen, has a
diverse repertoire: the KID, Nimzo/Queen's Indian, QGD and nowadays,
the Semi-Slav. As with 5.Bg5 against it, this entered his repertoire
just last year, but with Black his results have been excellent - three
wins (including one against his fellow second Wojtaszek) and four
draws (including one against Kramnik).
(3) Radoslaw Wojtaszek (FIDE Rating: 2599)
Wojtaszek is a "lefty" in chess, with a strong preference for 1.d4
(and 1.Nf3 comes in second). At the Nimzo/Queen's junction, he
primarily plays 3.Nf3. Against the Semi-Slav, he has only played
5.Bg5, so far without much success (+0 -3 =3 against players > 2450).
With Black against 1.e4, he's a Sicilianista, with an occasional
Caro-Kann and still more occasional French. 1...e5 almost doesn't
exist for him - only 8 games in Mega, only one of which occurred after
2001. (On the other hand, it was a win with Black over Volokitin in
the Gajewski Gambit of the Ruy Lopez.) Against 1.d4, he always plays
1...Nf6, and after 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 goes for both the Modern Benoni and
the Queen's Indian. After 3.Nc3 he generally goes for the
Nimzo-Indian, but even here he sometimes braves the Modern Benoni.
(4) Surya Shekhar Ganguly (FIDE Rating: 2603)
Ganguly, like Rauzer, Fischer and Weaver Adams, believes that 1.e4 is
"best by test". He used to play the Scotch from time to time, but now
seems a Ruy specialist. He has a terrific record against the Berlin,
mostly attained against sub-2500 players and using the sideline 4.O-O
Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Ba4. He has faced the Sveshnikov Sicilian many times,
and here too his score is very good but based largely on beating up on
(relative) weakies. There he used to prefer 9.Bxf6, but since 2004 his
main move has been 9.Nd5.
With Black, Ganguly has a very strong preference for 1...e5 against
1.e4, and his main line is the Moeller against the Ruy (3...a6 4.Ba4
Nf6 5.O-O b5 6.Bb3 Bc5). Against 1.d4 he plays both 1...Nf6 and
1...d5. When using the former, he goes for the Gruenfeld and Benko
Gambit; when the latter, the QGA (which Anand used to play - with very
poor results - against Kramnik in the early 2000s).
Superficially, then, Heine Nielsen and Kasimdzhanov make obvious sense
not only by strength but their repertoires as well. We'll see as the
match progresses if Wojtaszek and Ganguly fit in the same obvious way,
but even if they don't I'm sure Anand will put them to good use. They
are young and will have a lot of energy for the misery Anand is bound
to put them through in the match. And Ganguly, as a fellow Indian with
Anand, may help him feel more at home (though for Anand, it's plain
that in the main he experiences the rain in Spain).
References
1. http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1223882091.shtml
More information about the chessmind
mailing list