[chessmind] Dennis Monokroussos: Amber Rapid & Blindfold: Day 1
Email subscription to blog articles
chessmind at lists.powerblogs.com
Sun Mar 16 00:05:20 EDT 2008
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos:
Amber Rapid & Blindfold: Day 1
http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1205639039.shtml
The tournament exceeded expectations on its opening day: there were
plenty of exciting games, and the ultimate highlight was the showdown
of the world champions.
Session 1: Blindfold
The way the tournament works is this: it's a double-round robin, where
the players face each other in both a regular rapid game (25' + 10")
and a blindfold game (25' + 20"). The games aren't played back to
back, but instead occur in a format that maximizes fan enjoyment. The
field is split into two groups (call them "Group A" and the other half
"Group B"; of course the identity of each group varies every round),
and the day's action is divided into four sessions:
Session 1: Group A - blindfold
Session 2: Group B - blindfold
Session 3: Group A - rapid
Session 4: Group B - rapid
Now to the particulars of the day's action. Here are the results of
session 1:
Mamedyarov - Morozevich 1/2-1/2
Anand - Kramnik 1/2-1/2
Topalov - Leko 1-0
Morozevich brought one of his signature openings, the Chigorin Defense
(1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nc6!?) out of mothballs, and with great success. He
enjoyed an advantage from early on, and increased it until he reached
what seems to have been a winning queen and bishop vs. queen and
opposite-colored bishop ending. Unfortunately for Morozevich,
Mamedyarov managed to trade queens, blockade his opponent's passed
pawns, and sneak out with a draw.
Anand-Kramnik was an uneventful draw. Anand tried the trendy - or
desperate - 5.Nc3, but Kramnik drew without any trouble at all.
In Topalov-Leko, Black's 11th move was unusual, allowing White to
reach a comfortable middlegame with opposite-colored bishops. Black's
position was passive and his bishop somewhat irrelevant, and Leko's
attempt to ameliorate the drawbacks of his position at the cost of a
pawn only added to the list of woes. A very convincing win by Topalov.
Session 2:
Aronian - van Wely 1/2-1/2
Carlsen - Ivanchuk 0-1
Gelfand - Karjakin 0-1
Aronian-van Wely was a very sharp Vienna QGD. Aronian kept sacrificing
things, and while they didn't some compelling at the time, he had
enough to encourage van Wely to force a perpetual.
Carlsen likes to play the Open Ruy with Black from time to time, but
this time he was forced to combat it. Carlsen's approach was to play
for mate, building up on the kingside, but he underestimated Black's
queenside counterplay. Ivanchuk won a pawn, neutralized Carlsen's
threats, and pulled out a win.
Meanwhile, Karjakin, Carlsen's neglected contemporary, defeated
Gelfand with the black pieces. Karjakin enjoyed an edge early on,
thanks to his superior queenside structure. Eventually all the pawns
were on the same side of the board, but although I believe Gelfand
should have held the game, the opposite-colored bishops were a
nightmare. Black's strong dark-squared bishop gave him an enduring
attack, while White's passive light-squared bishop was only a
spectator. Faced with mate or the loss of his queen, Gelfand gave up.
Session 3:
Kramnik - Anand 0-1
Morozevich - Mamedyarov 1/2-1/2
Leko - Topalov 1/2-1/2
Let's discuss the less impressive games first: Morozevich again
pressed Mamedyarov in a g3 Pirc (by transposition), but was again
unable to collect the full point, while in Leko-Topalov the former
world champ always had sufficient compensation for a sacrificed pawn,
but not (much) more.
Now for the big game. Anand played the perenially popular 4...Ba6 QID,
but he made things lively with the combative 12...f5. The game
gradually took on the characteristics of a Dutch Stonewall, with White
trying to break through on the queenside and Black on the kingside.
Kramnik broke through alright, winning material and creating some
dangerous, far-advanced passed pawns. The only slight problem was his
lonely king, almost completely abandoned on the kingside. It took some
sacrifices, including above all the spectacular 42...Qf3!!, but
Anand's mating attack succeeded. A very nice win for the world
champion, and a painful reminder to Kramnik that if he wants to win
their match later this year, he'd better do it in the slow games.
Session 4:
Karjakin - Gelfand 1/2-1/2
van Wely - Aronian 0-1
Ivanchuk - Carlsen 1/2-1/2
In a Bishop's Opening Karjakin quickly obtained the bishop pair and a
micro-advantage, but the structural symmetry secured safety for the
sable forces: draw.
Van Wely-Aronian was a most interesting game. Aronian offer an
exchange sacrifice for several moves in a row, but van Wely wouldn't
bite. In fact, van Wely promptly offered his own exchange sacrifice!
Aronian grabbed the material, though it looked pretty risky: White's
material compensation of two bishops and a pawn for a rook (in
addition to the other pieces) together with his apparent positional
compensation seemed to favor White. Van Wely missed some nasty
tactics, however, allowing Black to gain a pawn, the initiative, and
ultimately the full point.
Finally, there was Ivanchuk-Carlsen. Carlsen blundered (or
sacrificed?) a pawn, but his position was solid enough to make White's
winning chances very unclear. Things continued normally through
Black's 35th, which invited a N + 4 vs. N + 3 pawn ending with all the
pawns on the same side. In the textbook case where the defender has
f-, g- and h-pawns, the strong side ought to win; here, however,
Carlsen would have e-, f- and g-pawns, giving him significantly better
drawing chances. This is all purely hypothetical, however, because
Ivanchuk played the stunning 36.Nxa3!?, pushing hard - almost too hard
- for the win. After various adventures, the game was drawn.
All the games can be replayed on the [1]tournament site (go to the
Games tab), while my comments to Kramnik-Anand and Ivanchuk-Carlsen
are [2]here.
Tomorrow's pairings:
Session 1:
Ivanchuk - Gelfand
van Wely - Carlsen
Karjakin - Aronian
Session 2:
Kramnik - Leko
Morozevich - Topalov
Anand - Mamedyarov
For Sessions 3 & 4, flip the colors for sessions 1 & 2, respectively.
References
1. http://www.amberchess2008.com/
2. http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/files/amber2008_rd1.htm
More information about the chessmind
mailing list