[antimedia] antimedia: You can't get much more disgusting....
Email subscription to blog articles
antimedia at lists.powerblogs.com
Sat Jan 19 01:14:48 EST 2008
Posted by antimedia:
You can't get much more disgusting....
http://www.antimedia.us/posts/1200723281.shtml
....[1]than this op-ed in WaPo.
After watching Fred Thompson debate his Republican rivals, I have
often wondered why he is not in the top tier of candidates. He
seems to have John McCain's honesty, without his razor-sharp edges,
and Mitt Romney's conservatism, without his jaw-dropping
inconsistencies.
This contrast between Thompson's large political talent and his
poor political performance has led to persistent questions: Does he
lack ambition? Energy?
This week, he added one more to the list: Does he lack moral
seriousness?
At a campaign stop attended by a CBS reporter in Lady's Island,
S.C., Thompson was asked if he, "as a Christian, as a
conservative," supported President Bush's global AIDS initiative.
"Christ didn't tell us to go to the government and pass a bill to
get some of these social problems dealt with. He told us to do it,"
Thompson responded. "The government has its role, but we need to
keep firmly in mind the role of the government, and the role of us
as individuals and as Christians on the other."
Thompson went on: "I'm not going to go around the state and the
country with regards to a serious problem and say that I'm going to
prioritize that. With people dying of cancer, and heart disease,
and children dying of leukemia still, I got to tell you -- we've
got a lot of problems here. . . . " Indeed, there are a lot of
problems here -- mainly of Thompson's own making.
While he is not an isolationist, he clearly is playing to
isolationist sentiments. His objection, it seems, is not to
government spending on public health but to spending on foreigners.
But this is badly shortsighted. America is engaged in a high-stakes
ideological struggle in Africa, where radicals and terrorists seek
to fill the vacuum of failed and hopeless societies. Fighting
disease and promoting development are important foreign policy
tools in this struggle, which Thompson apparently does not
appreciate or even understand.
Thompson's argument reflects an anti-government extremism, which I
am sure his defenders would call a belief in limited government. In
this case, Thompson is limiting government to a half-full thimble.
Its duties apparently do not extend to the treatment of sick people
in extreme poverty, which should be "the role of us as individuals
and as Christians." One wonders, in his view, if responding to the
2004 tsunami should also have been a private responsibility.
Religious groups are essential to fighting AIDS, but they cannot
act on a sufficient scale.
Excuse me?
Thompson is saying that governments can't (and shouldn't) try to solve
every problem, and from that Gerson gets that Thompson is pandering to
isolationists and spewing "anti-government extremism"? It's no wonder
this country is so screwed up when we have "intellectuals" like this
propounding stupidity to the masses.
Government's duty is to provide for basic services, keep us safe in
our homes and then get the hell out of our way. It is our
responsibility to decide to whom we give our money and to what causes
we will donate. America would be a much better place if we each would
take responsibility for the care of the needy rather than foisting
that responsibility off on government and then patting ourselves on
the back for being "generous".
That includes the needy in Africa.
Tags: [2]federalism [3]fred08 [4]isolationism [5]anti-government
References
1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/17/AR2008011702243.html
2. http://technorati.com/tag/federalism
3. http://technorati.com/tag/fred08
4. http://technorati.com/tag/isolationism
5. http://technorati.com/tag/anti-government
More information about the antimedia
mailing list