[antimedia] antimedia: Truer now than when it was written....
Email subscription to blog articles
antimedia at lists.powerblogs.com
Mon Jul 9 22:35:05 EDT 2007
Posted by antimedia:
Truer now than when it was written....
http://www.antimedia.us/posts/1184034897.shtml
....[1]This seems more apropos now than ever before.
Recently, I was asked to look at the recent events through the lens
of military history. I have joined the cast of thousands who have
written an "open letter to Americans."
14 September, 2001
Dear friends and fellow Americans
Like everyone else in this great country, I am reeling from last
week's attack on our sovereignty. But unlike some, I am not reeling
from surprise. As a career soldier and a student and teacher of
military history, I have a different perspective and I think you
should hear it.
This war will be won or lost by the American citizens, not
diplomats, politicians or soldiers. Let me briefly explain. In
spite of what the media, and even our own government is telling us,
this act was not committed by a group of mentally deranged
fanatics. To dismiss them as such would be among the gravest of
mistakes. This attack was committed by a ferocious, intelligent and
dedicated adversary. Don't take this the wrong way. I don't admire
these men and I deplore their tactics, but I respect their
capabilities. The many parallels that have been made with the
Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor are apropos. Not only because it
was a brilliant sneak attack against a complacent America, but also
because we may well be pulling our new adversaries out of caves 30
years after we think this war is over, just like my father's
generation had to do with the formidable Japanese in the years
following WW II.
These men hate the United States with all of their being, and we
must not underestimate the power of their moral commitment.
Napoleon, perhaps the world's greatest combination of soldier and
statesman, stated the moral is to the physical as three is to one.
Patton thought the Frenchman underestimated its importance and said
moral conviction was five times more important in battle than
physical strength. Our enemies are willing â better said anxious â
to give their lives for their cause. How committed are we America?
And for how long?
In addition to demonstrating great moral conviction, the recent
attack demonstrated a mastery of some of the basic fundamentals of
warfare taught to most military officers worldwide, namely
simplicity, security and surprise. When I first heard rumors that
some of these men may have been trained at our own Air War College,
it made perfect sense to me. This was not a random act of violence,
and we can expect the same sort of military competence to be
displayed in the battle to come. This war will escalate, with a
good portion of it happening right here in the good ol' U.S. of A.
These men will not go easily into the night. They do not fear us.
We must not fear them.
In spite of our overwhelming conventional strength as the world's
only superpower (a truly silly term), we are the underdog in this
fight. As you listen to the carefully scripted rhetoric designed to
prepare us for the march for war, please realize that America is
not equipped or seriously trained for the battle ahead. To be
certain, our soldiers are much better than the enemy, and we have
some excellent counter-terrorist organizations, but they are mostly
trained for hostage rescues, airfield seizures, or the occasional
body snatch, (which may come in handy). We will be fighting a war
of annihilation, because if their early efforts are any indication,
our enemy is ready and willing to die to the last man. Eradicating
the enemy will be costly and time consuming. They have already
deployed their forces in as many as 20 countries, and are likely
living the lives of everyday citizens.
Simply put, our soldiers will be tasked with a search and destroy
mission on multiple foreign landscapes, and the public must be
patient and supportive until the strategy and tactics can be worked
out. For the most part, our military is still in the process of
redefining itself and is presided over by men and women who grew up
with - and were promoted because they excelled in - Cold War
doctrine, strategy and tactics. This will not be linear warfare,
there will be no clear centers of gravity to strike with high
technology weapons. Our vast technological edge will certainly be
helpful, but it will not be decisive. Perhaps the perfect metaphor
for the coming battle was introduced by the terrorists themselves
aboard the hijacked aircraft â this will be a knife fight, and it
will be won or lost by the ingenuity and will of citizens and
soldiers, not by software or smart bombs. We must also be patient
with our military leaders.
Unlike Americans who are eager to put this messy time behind us,
our adversaries have time on their side, and they will use it. They
plan to fight a battle of attrition, hoping to drag the battle out
until the American public loses its will to fight. This might be
difficult to believe in this euphoric time of flag waving and
patriotism, but it is generally acknowledged that America lacks the
stomach for a long fight. We need only look as far back as Vietnam,
when North Vietnamese General Vo Nguyen Giap (also a military
history teacher) defeated the United States of America without ever
winning a major tactical battle. American soldiers who marched to
war cheered on by flag waving Americans in 1965 were reviled and
spat upon less than three years later when they returned.
Although we hope that Usama Bin Laden is no Giap, he is certain to
understand and employ the concept. We can expect not only large
doses of pain like the recent attacks, but also less audacious sand
in the gears tactics, ranging from livestock infestations to
attacks at water supplies and power distribution facilities. These
attacks are designed to hit us in our comfort zone forcing the
average American to pay more and play less and eventually eroding
our resolve. But it can only work if we let it. It is clear to me
that the will of the American citizenry - you and I - is the center
of gravity the enemy has targeted. It will be the fulcrum upon
which victory or defeat will turn. He believes us to be soft,
impatient, and self-centered. He may be right, but if so, we must
change. The Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz, (the most often
quoted and least read military theorist in history), says that
there is a remarkable trinity of war that is composed of the (1)
will of the people, (2) the political leadership of the government,
and (3) the chance and probability that plays out on the field of
battle, in that order.
Every American citizen was in the crosshairs of last Tuesday's
attack, not just those that were unfortunate enough to be in the
World Trade Center or Pentagon. The will of the American people
will decide this war. If we are to win, it will be because we have
what it takes to persevere through a few more hits, learn from our
mistakes, improvise, and adapt. If we can do that, we will
eventually prevail.
Everyone I've talked to in the past few days has shared a common
frustration, saying in one form or another, "I just wish I could do
something!" You are already doing it. Just keep faith in America,
and continue to support your President and military, and the
outcome is certain. If we fail to do so, the outcome is equally
certain. God Bless America
Dr. Tony Kern, Lt Col, USAF (Ret)
Former Director of Military History, USAF Academy
Note that Dr. Kern stated "This war will be won or lost by the
American citizens, not diplomats, politicians or soldiers."
Something to think about.
Tags: [2]war [3]terrorism [4]America [5]morality [6]courage
References
1. http://www.snopes.com/rumors/tonykern.htm
2. http://technorati.com/tag/war
3. http://technorati.com/tag/terrorism
4. http://technorati.com/tag/America
5. http://technorati.com/tag/morality
6. http://technorati.com/tag/courage
More information about the antimedia
mailing list