[antimedia] antimedia: The grand fitnah....
Email subscription to blog articles
antimedia at lists.powerblogs.com
Wed Sep 20 22:30:12 EDT 2006
Posted by antimedia:
The grand fitnah....
http://www.antimedia.us/posts/1158805810.shtml
....Messopotamian [1]discusses the chaos in Iraq, asserting that it's
deliberately created by the forces in Iraq who oppose democracy. (He
doesn't name them, but the Syrians, Iranians, dead-ender Baathists and
Al Qaeda terrorists come readily to mind.)
In the present complex befogged situation there are so many urgent
questions to address that I find it hard where to start. What is
clear, however is that the U.S. in particular and the West in
general are facing serious challenges on several fronts, and these
challenges are proving more serious than they expected and
bargained for. This calls for reexamination and rethinking some
previous ideas and notions and devising new approaches and methods
to deal with situations that are quite different from previously
conceived scenarios. The crucial questions concern the course of
action that has to be taken now. What would be the best way to
counterattack, conceding that the initiative seems to be in the
otherâs hands? The answers to these questions require much careful
consideration. To start with we must ask ourselves quite bluntly:
is there a way out that will ensure a satisfactory outcome from our
point of view? Well to cut a long story short, I would like to
begin with a conclusion contrary to good writing practice. I
believe that despite all the mistakes that were made there is still
a way to succeed. This way is both technical on the one side and
political and economic on the other. But this has to be the subject
of future posts.
As a footnote I would like to draw your attention to this . I have
some inside information regarding the situation in the Anbar, where
there is a real split amongst the Dulaim Tribes into anti-terrorist
and pro-terrorist camps. That might be a subject for an interesting
future post.
What he wants to draw your attention to is [2]WaPo article that
discusses some interesting developments in western Iraq.
With a biker's bandanna tied under his helmet, the Special Forces
team sergeant gunned a Humvee down a desert road in Iraq's volatile
Anbar province. Skirting the restive town of Hit, the team of a
dozen soldiers crossed the Euphrates River into an oasis of
relative calm: the rural heartland of the powerful Albu Nimr tribe.
Green Berets skilled in working closely with indigenous forces have
enlisted one of the largest and most influential tribes in Iraq to
launch a regional police force -- a rarity in this Sunni insurgent
stronghold. Working deals and favors over endless cups of spiced
tea, they built up their wasta -- or pull -- with the ancient
tribe, which boasts more than 300,000 members. They then began
empowering the tribe to safeguard its territory and help interdict
desert routes for insurgents and weapons. The goal, they say, is to
spread security outward to envelop urban trouble spots such as Hit.
Col. Falah Salah Shimra heads the new police force in al-Furat, in
Iraq's restive Anbar province. A U.S. Special Forces team persuaded
an influential local tribe to supply recruits.
Col. Falah Salah Shimra heads the new police force in al-Furat, in
Iraq's restive Anbar province. A U.S. Special Forces team persuaded
an influential local tribe to supply recruits.
But the initial progress has been tempered by friction between the
team of elite troops and the U.S. Army's battalion that oversees
the region. At one point this year, the battalion's commander,
uncomfortable with his lack of control over a team he saw as
dangerously undisciplined, sought to expel it from his turf,
officers on both sides acknowledged.
That friction is telling.
I'm sure many Americans who are ignorant of the military think it's
one huge, well-oiled machine. While it may appear that way on the
surface, underneath are all sorts of tensions and contradictory
agendas.
One of the places that tension rears its ugly head regularly is
between the "regular" Army and the Special Forces folks. You see, West
Point types think of the Special Forces folks as "rogue" units that
they can't control.
The conflict in the Anbar camp, while extreme, is not an isolated
phenomenon in Iraq, U.S. officers say. It highlights two clashing
approaches to the war: the heavy focus of many regular U.S.
military units on sweeping combat operations; and the more
fine-grained, patient work Special Forces teams put into building
rapport with local leaders, security forces and the people -- work
that experts consider vital in a counterinsurgency.
"This war was fought with a conventional mind-set. The conventional
units are bogged down in cities doing the same old thing," said the
Special Forces team's 44-year-old sergeant, who like all the Green
Berets interviewed was not allowed to be quoted by name for
security reasons. "It's not about bulldozing Hit, driving through
with a tank, with all the kids running away. . . . These
insurgencies are defeated by personal relationships."
The real battles, he said, are unfolding "in a sheik's house,
squatting in the desert eating with my right hand and smoking
Turkish cigarettes and trying to influence tribes to rise up
against an insurgency."
For all the results Green Berets regularly get, the stiff necks
salivate for a chance to clean them up, straighten them out and make
them fly right. And if screwing with their plans will irritate them a
little, all the better.
All of this works to make everyone's job harder and success more
difficult to achieve. But if you ask the players involved, they will
tell you, to a man, that they are trying to win the war.
The best you can hope for is that the right guys have the clout to get
things done.
References
1. http://messopotamian.blogspot.com/2006_09_01_messopotamian_archive.html#115838422006042046
2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/14/AR2006091401900.html
More information about the antimedia
mailing list